Skip to content

Vitamin D: how much to take

Vitamin D helps you absorb calcium and keeps bones and muscles working. Skin makes it from sunlight, so needs from pills depend a lot on season and latitude.

Calculator Official intake Study doses Expert targets Best form Works with Safety Sources

Adults 18+ only
Loading calculator…

Official daily intake

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)

AI (adequate intake)

Men15 µg
Women15 µg
Pregnancy15 µg
Breastfeeding15 µg

Safe upper limit: 100 µg a day

Set for little or no sun on the skin. With regular sun, needs from food and supplements are lower.

Source: EFSA NDA Panel 2016 · EFSA 2025

NIH / NASEM (United States)

RDA (recommended dietary allowance)

Men 18-7015 µg
Men 71+20 µg
Women 18-7015 µg
Women 71+20 µg
Pregnancy15 µg
Breastfeeding15 µg

Safe upper limit: 100 µg a day

Assumes minimal sunlight.

Source: National Academies (NASEM) 2019

Doses used in studies

These are doses tested in research, not personal advice. Some exceed the upper limit because they were short courses or given under medical care.

Strong evidenceStrong: meta-analyses of randomised trials or a large trial, with results that agree.Based on 1 randomised trial, 1 review or position paper.How grades workNo benefit or harm found

Prevent cancer or heart disease in healthy older adults

50 µg a day

VITAL gave 2000 IU (50 µg) a day to 25,871 adults for about 5 years. It did not lower cancer or major cardiovascular events compared with placebo. Later meta-analyses saw lower cancer deaths, but not fewer cancers.

Manson JE et al. 2019 · Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Buring JE 2020

Moderate evidenceModerate: smaller trials, mixed results or official guidance.Based on 1 meta-analysis.How grades work

Fewer respiratory infections (colds, flu)

10-25 µg a day

Meta-analysis of randomised trials: overall the protective effect was small. Daily doses of 400 to 1000 IU (10 to 25 µg) showed the clearest benefit (odds ratio 0.70), while large monthly or weekly bolus doses did not.

Jolliffe DA et al. 2021

Targets from expert bodies

These targets come from named organisations, not from EFSA or the NIH. They are listed so you can see the case for a higher intake, with the source behind each one.

Moderate evidenceModerate: smaller trials, mixed results or official guidance.Based on 1 official reference.How grades workMedical or scientific body

Linus Pauling Institute: Daily supplement for healthy adults

50 µg a day

The Linus Pauling Institute recommends that generally healthy adults take 2,000 IU (50 µg) of supplemental vitamin D a day, more than three times the EFSA adequate intake of 15 µg. It is a research institute's recommendation, not an official reference value.

Linus Pauling Institute 2026

Strong evidenceStrong: meta-analyses of randomised trials or a large trial, with results that agree.Based on 1 official reference.How grades workMedical or scientific body

Endocrine Society: Who should take extra vitamin D

The 2024 guideline suggests extra vitamin D above the official intake only for people aged 75 and over, in pregnancy, for high-risk prediabetes, and for children and teenagers. It suggests against extra vitamin D for healthy adults under 75, and against routine blood testing. It also says the best dose is unclear from the trials.

Demay MB et al. 2024

Moderate evidenceModerate: smaller trials, mixed results or official guidance.Based on 1 official reference, 1 study.How grades workBased on a blood level

Endocrine Society: Blood level targets (withdrawn)

The Society no longer endorses its earlier blood targets of 30 ng/ml for "sufficiency" or 20 to 30 ng/ml for "insufficiency", because trials do not show a level that predicts who benefits from supplements. The NIH describes 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/l) and above as adequate for nearly everyone.

McCartney CR et al. 2024

Best form and why

Best form

D3 (cholecalciferol)

Why: D3 raises blood vitamin D more than D2 when given as large weekly or monthly doses. With daily doses the two were similar. D3 is also the form your skin makes.

Alternatives: D2 is fine for vegans if no vegan D3 (from lichen) is available. Take it with a meal that contains fat.

Tripkovic L et al. 2012

Works with

Helps or needs

  • CalciumStrong evidenceStrong: meta-analyses of randomised trials or a large trial, with results that agree.Based on 1 official reference.How grades work

    Vitamin D is needed to absorb calcium in the gut. Calcium supplements work best when your vitamin D intake is adequate.

    NIH Office of Dietary Supplements 2026

  • Vitamin K (K1, K2)Weak evidenceWeak: one small trial, pilot data or results that conflict.Based on 1 meta-analysis.How grades work

    Often sold together. A meta-analysis of 8 trials (971 people) found vitamin K plus vitamin D raised bone density a little more than no treatment, especially with K2 under 500 µg a day. The effect was small.

    Kuang X et al. 2020

Forms and labels

  • D3 (cholecalciferol)
  • D2 (ergocalciferol)

Food sources

Oily fish (salmon, herring, mackerel), egg yolks, fortified milk and spreads, UV-exposed mushrooms.

Interactions

Usually taken with calcium for bones. Take with a meal containing fat for better absorption. High doses with thiazide diuretics can raise blood calcium.

Safety

Too much over months can raise blood calcium (nausea, kidney stones). Stay under the safe limit unless a doctor treats a measured deficiency.

Pregnant, breastfeeding, on medication, or managing a health condition? Check with a doctor or pharmacist before starting a supplement.

Sources

  1. Official reference EFSA NDA Panel (2016). Dietary reference values for vitamin D. EFSA Journal
  2. Official reference EFSA (2025). Overview on Tolerable Upper Intake Levels as derived by the SCF and the EFSA NDA Panel (version 11, August 2025). EFSA
  3. Official reference National Academies (NASEM) (2019). Dietary Reference Intakes: RDA, AI and UL tables (via NIH ODS Nutrient Recommendations). Food and Nutrition Board
  4. Randomised trial Manson JE et al. (2019). Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease (VITAL). N Engl J Med 380:33-44
  5. Review / position paper Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Buring JE (2020). Principal results of the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) and updated meta-analyses. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 198:105522
  6. Meta-analysis Jolliffe DA et al. (2021). Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9(5)
  7. Meta-analysis Tripkovic L et al. (2012). Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr
  8. Official reference Linus Pauling Institute (2026). Micronutrient inadequacies: the remedy (checked November 2026). Oregon State University
  9. Official reference Demay MB et al. (2024). Vitamin D for the prevention of disease: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 109:1907-1947
  10. Official reference McCartney CR et al. (2024). Vitamin D insufficiency and epistemic humility: an Endocrine Society guideline communication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 109:1948-1954
  11. Official reference NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Calcium: fact sheet for health professionals (checked November 2026). NIH ODS
  12. Meta-analysis Kuang X et al. (2020). The combination effect of vitamin K and vitamin D on human bone quality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Food Funct 11:3280-3297

Values checked: November 12, 2026.

Fact sheets on other sites

Independent summaries to read alongside this page. PillMath is not affiliated with these sites.

Other supplements